The oldest parts of the church, including the lower tower and a stretch of the west wall, survive from the Romanesque period. Traces of an early window opening and medieval masonry have been identified during archaeological study, and a large rune stone, inscribed in memory of a warrior companion of a king named Knut, is set into the tower's south wall. The tower's base is thought to have originally served as a baptismal space.
By the 1700s parishioners considered the old medieval church too dark, cramped and structurally weak, and in 1751 they resolved to demolish the long nave and choir and build anew. The new church, completed and consecrated in 1753 by Bishop Andreas Rhyzelius, reused some stone from the old building, including pieces still bearing traces of medieval painted decoration, concealed beneath a thick coat of pink render. A spire was added to the medieval tower some years later.
Inside, the altarpiece was designed by Abraham Bengtsson Nyström and holds a painting of Christ with the communion chalice by the nineteenth-century artist Mårten Eskil Winge, a gift from a local landowner. A carved oak pulpit from the 1600s, associated with a Vadstena workshop, stands on the north side of the nave. Fragments of the church's earliest font, decorated with a ram and three faces, are preserved, alongside a later medieval limestone font and a striking triumphal crucifix attributed to a skilled thirteenth-century carver.
The organ case on the west gallery was built by the noted organ-maker Jonas Wistenius in the 1760s, funded by a local benefactor; although his original pipework is gone, the handsome facade remains, now fronting a mechanical organ installed in the mid-twentieth century. Sculptures of Moses and John, created by Olof Ahlberg, were given by members of the Wallenberg banking family in memory of ancestors who served as clergy at Landeryd in the early 1800s.
A 2004 extension to the north-west, built to accommodate a pantry and toilet, prompted an archaeological survey of the medieval masonry and a full re-rendering of the church after the plaster was removed for documentation. The project proved contentious among those concerned about disturbing historic fabric, though the national heritage authority argued the addition would stand as a legible sign of its own era for future observers.